Was it only last week I spent days live-tweeting the 2013 Reading Matters conference? I didn’t have time or head space to add any thoughts of my own at the time, so here are a few now.
A great line-up of authors debated a wide range of issues but there were a couple of thorny topics that just wouldn’t go away – as usual, chief among them was gender.
A few questions almost always come up in conferences, seminars and conversations, especially with school or children’s librarians and teachers, such as:
- How do we get boys to read?
- Why don’t boys read books with female protagonists?
- Why do the book covers aim at readers of particular genders?
I can’t pretend to be able to answer those questions, but I do want to reflect on how and why the questions and answers are framed.
Many times I’ve listened to an author try to answer the question ‘How do we get boys to read?’ I get asked it myself, all the time. I sympathise, I really, do, because I understand that it can be very frustrating for professionals and parents. But…
1. You are asking the wrong person. Just about every author ever asked that question answers something along the lines of: I just write the stories I need to tell. Some are aimed at boys, some are aimed at girls, some are neutral.
2. Some of the gendering is about the package – the cover, the blurb, the author’s gender or name, the marketing, the industry, socialised reader expectations, the context of both reader and book. Sometimes that’s perfectly appropriate. Often it’s not. Take a look at some examples in Maureen Johnson’s Coverflip experiment if you doubt it.
3. Boys do read. They read all sorts of stuff. Even those who read according to strict gender stereotypes immerse themselves in narrative through games and movies; they may love non-fiction; they read basketball magazines or music blogs or comics; they read facebook and use the web and their phones; and they do endless amounts of homework. They might not read my books or other books with girls on the cover – which is a different question – but that’s not the same as not reading at all. Not everyone has to read the same thing.
4. There are actually many authors who do consciously write for boys. Without even reaching for names I can think of Keith Gray, Jack Heath, Brian Falkner, Richard Newsome – not to mention the bulk of the Western canon.
So here is the most important thing: The entire world is constructed for boys. Can we stop pretending they are some oppressed minority, stop asking us to arrange the stories we write and publish to their (perceived) narrow interests?
Suck it up, guys. As Gayle Forman asked at Reading Matters: “Why is it acceptable for a girl to enter a male world but not the opposite?”
Why do we accept that world-view so carefully constructed for them by society?
Why is it too much to ask a boy or young man to see through other eyes? Does it mean you can’t ask them to see through anyone else’s eyes – to read about anything outside their own experience? And if so, what does that say about how we are framing the future?
Are you telling me that a fourteen year-old boy can relate readily to a hobbit or an assassin or a forty year-old man, but not a girl?
I don’t believe that.
At Reading Matters, Libba Bray said: “There are not boy books or girl books. There are just books.”
I think that’s true, to an extent, although there are some stories and some authors who do aim their books at one gender or the other, just as we aim our books at certain age groups, quite consciously, depending on the story. Keith Gray writes for boys, hoping, he said at the conference, not to alienate female readers.
As Miffy Farquharson tweeted during the conference: “Teacher-librarians are good at ‘guessing’ what young people would like to read. Often it’s just ‘a good book’.”
Readers are always asked to make imaginative leaps – into fantasy worlds, or along ziplines between buildings, or into the past. We might be asked to read the story of someone we despise or can’t trust. Female readers constantly take the imaginative leap into the minds of male characters. Kids who are queer may spend their entire lives seeing the world through the eyes of straight characters. Happily, there is now a greater diversity in stories and characters than ever before, so that young readers from different cultural backgrounds or life experiences can find some stories that reflect their world. But much of the time, they’ll be reading about someone completely Other, and they relate – they find some imaginative or emotional connection with those characters, they see something in those lives that makes sense for them, they read to witness another world, another way of seeing. Vikki Wakefield noted in one panel: “Age and gender do not define a reader.”
The world is filled with different perspectives and readers get to experience those perspectives, to see the world through different eyes – to see new worlds, feel unfamiliar sensations and emotions. If boys don’t get to do that, never make those leaps, they’re missing out dreadfully. They can do it – of course they can. They do it all the time – even the most stereotypical readers or gamers or movie-goers imagine themselves into pirate ships or D-Day or Westeros. “If we do our job properly,” said Morris Gleitzman on one panel, “boys will read girl characters.”
Calling for narratives that support that limited world view only perpetuates the problem – for the boys, and for the rest of the world. It continues to limit them, reduces their world view and doesn’t even echo back to them the world in which they live. Nor does it recognise the diverse lives and experiences of young males in our world, as if they are never outsiders, as if they are never readers, as if they don’t share the same fears and hopes and emotions as everyone else. It defines them as people who will only read The Guinness Book of Records or short action-driven stories (not that there’s anything wrong with either). But as Gleitzman noted: ‘There’s not a boy on this planet that doesn’t understand love gone wrong”.
Why do we always end up here? What about discussing the girls who are struggling? The boys who love to read? The girls who consume books? The girls who love to read adventures and war stories and fight scenes? The readers who read regardless of gendered covers or narratives or protagonists?
Why do we always end up here in spite of the fact that every available piece of research tells us that books featuring female protagonists and/or by women authors are less likely to be in the big prize shortlists; that they are less likely to be reviewed; that women are less likely to be writing the reviews; that in spite of the huge proportion of women authors, publishers, teachers and librarians, the people most often in the positions of decision-making power are men – totally out of proportion to the number of men in the industry (as is the case with most other industries where women are in the majority, such as teaching)?
Why, in spite of all that research, would someone perfectly sensible like Keith Gray suggest at Reading Matters that books for or about boys suffer discrimination due to the “female domination” of the book industry – and why would a whole lot of women in the audience agree? What is that about?
Final word to the brilliant Gayle Forman: “If Harry Potter had been about Hermione, it probably wouldn’t have been such a success.”
Case rests. For now.
Note: These are my views as a writer and reader, not in my capacity as a Library person.
6 thoughts on “A few thoughts on gender in YA”
Bravo, Kelly! “The entire world is constructed for boys.” – pretty much.
I agree about Keith Gray’s “won’t somebody please think of the boys?!” speech – I didn’t agree with it. I think if males feel like the publishing world isn’t friendly enough for them (apart from the high-profile CEO positions) then suck it up – come back when you’ve been oppressed for a few centuries and then come and talk to us about how books and the publishing industry isn’t ‘boy-friendly’ enough for you.
And when it comes to genderised covers – I loved everything Libba said (actually, I just love Libba.) And I think the conversation needs to be widened to marketing in general. I think Riley says it best; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CU040Hqbas
And on the topic of YA starting to be more LGBTI inclusive – that’s also one of the issues I have with this ‘New Adult’ rubbish. NA is all romance, but it’s all the same sort of romance … (white) boy meets (white) girl. It’s another reason we don’t need it – YA pushes boundaries, NA seems to be staying with the rigid perimeters.
Thanks, Danielle. I’m starting to wonder if the only similarity between New Adult and Young Adult is the single word in the name of the marketing category?
a really thought-provoking piece. It’s interesting that you perceive that I consciously write for boys. I’m not sure that is the case; I’m not sure I consciously write for any particular type of reader. If I had to nominate anyone I write for, it would be for my 11-year-old self. The fact I was a boy and 11 in 1976 may provide some context for the books, but I certainly don’t sit down in front of a blank page and ask myself: what can I bung on here that a boy might like.
At age 11 I enjoyed mysteries and adventures. So I write adventurous mysteries, or mysterious adventures. But there’s no gender agenda.
I receive emails from three sets of readers: boys, girls and parents. The bulk of these come from girls, who respond extremely closely with the lead girl character in the series, Ruby Valentine. Does that mean I write for girls? Or that girls are more likely to take the time to fling off an email? The notes I get from parents are universally saying thanks for writing books that their boys can dive into. Does that mean I write for boys? Or that parents are overly concerned about their boys’ mental development. (I have a son. I understand their angst!)
I think I just write stories, and am grateful that anyone reads them at all: boy, girl, parent, or the cat.
Hi Richard, and apologies if I’ve misquoted you – I thought I recalled you saying that at a previous Reading Matters, but you’re right. I must have conflated the two. In fact your books are perfect examples of adventures that can be enjoyed by any gender and any age, no matter who they are aimed at.
I agree with you Kelly. You make some valid points about the “diasadvantaged males” in the YA and publishing industry in general. MIffy Farquharson and I exchanged a pointed look when Keith Gray was talking about it. I also agree the conversation needs to change. Enough with the reluctant boy readers! Yes, they exist, but I am currently working with the parents of two struggling girl readers (with some success I am happy to report) and the family of a male reader who is so voracious we can barely keep up! The focus needs to be more about hanging on to the readers once they reach a certain age. To convince them that reading a story is not childish, or worse, WORK. I did agree with Keith’s assertion that schools can kill the joy of reading. I have seen it happen with my own daughter, who until she started reading “class novels” and “texts” was someone who was constantly reading. She wants to read for pleasure, but has a level of reading ennui that is hard to overcome. In my work in public and school libraries over the past 25 years or so, the problem has NEVER been about gender for me. It is always about finding the book that reminds the YA reader that reading is an enjoyable experience. My job, as a librarian, is to connect the right reader with the right book, the right STORY. That is where the dialogue should be. How do we remind the kids, and reinforce with them, that reading is a fun and worthwhile thing to do?
Thanks for your insights, Kelly, and for adding value to the conversation.
Interesting! As a mum of boy readers I’ve certainly not seen an aversion to girl-hero books, altho it helps if those girl heroes are wielding weapons (ie Valkyrie, Skulduggery Pleasant, thank you Derek Landy, or Katniss, THG). They just want interesting characters, male or female. So much great YA lit out there. We can’t wait for The Sultans Eyes.